Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id AAA11324 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA182062228; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 21:17:08 -0700
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 21:17:08 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199604260421.VAA07949@sos.sos.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Andy Stevens <astevens@sos.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: RE: Recording to VHS
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
At 01:54 PM 4/25/96 -0700, you wrote:
>No. All NTSC video has the same vertical resolution, about 512 lines, I
>think. It is the horizontal resolution that varies from media to media.
>SVHS is abut 400 and laserdisc is about 425. VHS is about 320.
Correction: VHS IS 240 LINES.
Andy Stevens
>
>>----------
>>From: AlMejias@aol.com[SMTP:AlMejias@aol.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 25, 1996 10:42 AM
>>To: Multiple recipients of list
>>Subject: Re: Recording to VHS
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I read in one of the trade mags -- I think it was either DV or PC
>>Graphics
>>and Video -- that _VHS_ resolution is only about 320x240. Is this true?
>>If
>>so, wouldn't a 320x240 uncompressed anim look about the same or better
>>than a
>>640x480 compressed anim? If so, is so, then any card that can output
>>320x240
>>uncompressed anim would look just fine on VHS and meet the requierment
>>of
>>"**CHEAP**".
>>
>>Note, this is not strict Aristotelian logic.
>>
>>Al Mejias
>>AlMejias@aol.com
>>Albert_Mejias@msn.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Ulti-Media Productions http:/www.skagit.com/um
P.O. Box 444 astevens@sos.net
Anacortes, WA 98221
1-360-293-7044 1-360-299-2524 or Fax 1-360-299-2525